SkodaKodiaq 1.5 TSI Greentech ACT Business Edition Plus DSG (2019) vs Ford Kuga 2020 1.5 EcoBoost 150HP (2020) Ford Kuga 2020 1.5 EcoBoost 150HP (2020) vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2021 1.5 TSI 150HP (2020) Nissan X Trail 2018 1.6 dCi 4x2 (2017) vs Ford Kuga 2020 1.5 EcoBoost 150HP (2020) Buya new or used Volkswagen Polo on Cars.co.za. 5. Suzuki Celerio 1.0 GL automatic – 4.6 L/100km. The Suzuki Celerio automatic is the most fuel-efficient car in Suzuki’s lineup with a claimed fuel consumption of 4.6L/100km. However, the manual derivatives are only marginally thirstier at 4.7 L/100km.

Bynature, this Bluemotion model is more of a potterer than a pace-setter, but its 0-62mph time of 9.7sec and 127mph top speed are acceptable and ensure that it won’t feel out of its depth on

FordFocus 2022 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP (2022) vs Ford Focus 2022 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP Hybrid (2022) vs Ford Focus 2022 1.0 EcoBoost 155HP Hybrid Auto ST-Line (2022) 2023 Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI 4Drive. 2023 BMW G21 3 Series Touring LCI 318i Auto. 2024 Lexus LBX 1.5 Hybrid E-Four e-CVT.
The1.5 is only a tiny bit more efficient and, I believe, has very slightly more torque. There aren't any major differences between them, the design has been tweaked and improved, but not greatly. You won't notice the difference in real life, I drove both engines and couldn't tell, but only the 1.4 was available in the Leon at the time. Accordingto the EPA, a 2013 Jetta with the 5-cylinder engine was good for 23 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway with manual transmission, and 24/32 with the automatic. With the 1.8 TSI engine, those numbers jump to 26/36 with manual, and 25/36 with automatic. Passat fuel economy improves similarly. . 200 205 129 209 178 287 13 2 346

1.4 tsi vs 1.5 ecoboost